Supreme Court of Alabama
472 So.2d 630 (1985)
Mary Jane Porter (defendant) and her husband at the time, Denis Porter, purchased a residence as joint tenants in 1963. In 1976, the couple divorced. Their divorce decree stated that Mary Jane would have exclusive possession of the residence until a change in circumstances warranted a modification of the arrangement. Denis later married Martha Porter (plaintiff). When Denis died in 1983, Martha brought suit, claiming that when Denis divorced Mary Jane, their joint tenancy was severed, creating a tenancy in common. The trial court agreed, and awarded half of the residence to Martha. Mary Jane petitioned for certiorari to the Supreme Court of Alabama.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Almon, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 236,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.