Posik v. Layton
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 5th District
695 So.2d 759 (1997)
Emma Posik (plaintiff) and Nancy Layton (defendant) were a couple who entered into an agreement similar to that of a prenuptial agreement prior to moving to a different county together. The agreement stated that Layton would support Posik for the rest of Posik’s life, and would draft a will leaving Posik with her entire estate. The agreement also stated that a breach by Layton would require her to pay Posik liquidated damages in the amount of $2,500 per month for the rest of Posik’s life. Layton breached this agreement by moving in with another woman. Posik then brought suit to enforce their agreement. The trial court ruled in favor of Layton. Posik then appealed to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, 5th District.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Harris, J.)
Concurrence (Peterson, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.