Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Powder River Basin Resource Council v. Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission

Supreme Court of Wyoming
320 P.3d 222 (Wyo. 2014)


Facts

The Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (Commission) (defendant) issued regulations requiring companies that conducted hydraulic fracturing (hydrofracking) to disclose to the Commission the chemical compounds used by the companies in the hydrofracking process. The regulations provided that the disclosures would be subject to the confidentiality provisions in the Wyoming Public Records Act (WPRA), which protected the confidentiality of trade secrets. The WPRA did not define trade secrets. The Powder River Basin Resource Council and others (plaintiffs) submitted a public-records request to the Commission, seeking public disclosure of the chemical compounds filed with the Commission. In the Commission’s response to the request, certain information was redacted, including chemical compounds that the Commission had found to be trade secrets under the WPRA. The plaintiffs brought suit against the Commission, challenging its refusal to disclose the compounds. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (Halliburton) (defendant) intervened, seeking to protect hydrofracking chemical compounds as trade secrets. Halliburton argued that if the compounds were publicly disclosed, Halliburton’s competitors could reverse-engineer its product to its competitive disadvantage. The district court, using the standard of review prescribed by Wisconsin’s Administrative Procedure Act (APA), granted summary judgment to the Commission. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Davis, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.