Powers v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.

238 F.3d 414 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Powers v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
238 F.3d 414 (2000)

  • Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD

Facts

Amy Powers (plaintiff) and Michael D’Ambrosia had a joint investment account with American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. (American Express) (defendant) that was funded primarily from D’Ambrosia’s earnings. Powers and D’Ambrosia’s investment application with American Express required the signatures of both investors for any redemption request above $50,000. When Powers and D’Ambrosia later broke up, they asked American Express to freeze the joint investment account. Later, in a letter dated September 26, 1997, D’Ambrosia and Powers authorized a release of the freeze and instructed American Express to transfer the funds in the joint investment account to a Prudential Securities account. In a memo dated October 16, 1997, D’Ambrosia alone signed and sent instructions to American Express by fax to transfer all of the funds in the joint investment account to a joint bank account held by Powers and D’Ambrosia at FCNB Bank. American Express followed the instructions in the October 16 fax and wired $86,836.79 to the joint FCNB account. D’Ambrosia withdrew this money and absconded. Powers sued American Express to recover the money, claiming that American Express had violated section 8-507(b) of the Maryland Commercial Code. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Powers and awarded her damages of $86,836.79, with prejudgment interest. American Express appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership