Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. National Electrical Contractors Association Inc.

814 F.2d 358 (1987)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. National Electrical Contractors Association Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
814 F.2d 358 (1987)

Facts

The National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA) (defendant) established a fund to help defray NECA’s collective-bargaining costs. A prior agreement between an electrical-workers’ union and nonunion electrical contractors, including Premier Electrical Construction Company (Premier) (plaintiff), required the contractors to make a 1 percent contribution to the fund. The nonunion contractors filed a class-action lawsuit in Maryland against the association, the union, and the fund to challenge the contribution requirement. The Maryland court granted class certification three years later and ruled that the contribution requirement was illegal under the federal antitrust laws. The Maryland court deferred giving class members the required notice of class certification while the defendants appealed. The Maryland case settled while the appeals were pending. Premier, which did not like the settlement and wanted to assert a different damages theory, opted out of the Maryland class. Premier had a pending action against the association and the fund in an Illinois federal district court and asked the court in that action to apply offensive nonmutual collateral estoppel and bind the association and the fund to the rulings in the Maryland action that the fund contributions violated the federal antitrust laws. The Illinois district court reasoned that allowing issue preclusion would reduce claims and preserve judicial resources. The association and the fund appealed and argued that Premier should not be allowed the benefit of preclusion because Premier had six years to raise its theory of damages in the Maryland action.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Easterbrook, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership