Presbyterian Church in the United States v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church

393 U.S. 440 (1969)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Presbyterian Church in the United States v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church

United States Supreme Court
393 U.S. 440 (1969)

SR

Facts

The Presbyterian Church in the United States (the national church) (defendant) was a national association of local churches led by a governing body called the General Assembly. After a property dispute with the national church, two of the local churches in Savannah, Georgia (plaintiffs), withdrew their membership from the national church to form a separate, autonomous church. The local churches claimed that the national church had violated the national church’s constitution and tenets of the religion. The national church established a commission and agreed to recognize the withdrawal of the two local churches. However, the national church also demanded that the property used by the local churches be returned to the national church. The title to the property was in the names of the local churches. Rather than appealing the commission’s demand to the General Assembly, the local churches filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of Chatham County to enjoin the national church from trespassing on the property held by the local churches. The local churches argued that under Georgia law there was an implied trust that the property be used for the benefit of the national church only on the condition that the national church did not violate the tenets or practices of the religion. A jury considered whether the national church had fundamentally violated the tenets of the religion and returned a verdict for the local churches. The trial judge enjoined the national church from trespassing on the local churches’ property. The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to address the First Amendment issues.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership