Price v. INS
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
963 F.2d 836 (1991)
John Price (defendant) moved from the United Kingdom to the United States and was granted resident alien status in 1960. He thereafter remained in the United States to work. In 1984, Price applied to petition for naturalization but refused to answer Question 18 on the application which asked him to list all present or past affiliation with any organization or association. Instead, he submitted a legal brief arguing that Question 18 violated his First Amendment right of association. The district court denied his petition due to his refusal to answer Question 18. This appeal followed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Beezer, J)
Dissent (Noonan, J)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.