Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 19,800+ case briefs...

Princess Cruises, Inc. v. General Electric Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
143 F.3d 828 (1998)

Princess Cruises, Inc. v. General Electric Co.


Princess Cruises, Inc. (Princess) (plaintiff) scheduled one of its ships for inspection and repairs by General Electric Co. (GE) (defendant). Princess sent GE a purchase order that included a contract price, terms and conditions, and warranties. GE sent a final price quotation (the quote), which explicitly stated that the price was for specified “engineering services.” Though some goods were to be provided, many of the goods required for GE to do its work were already onboard. The quote included a different price, terms and conditions, and excluded all warranties. The quote restricted GE’s liability to the contract price and excluded recovery of consequential damages or lost profits. Princess gave GE permission to start work and paid in full. Princess later discovered that GE did not clean the rotor properly, which damaged the ship. Princess sued for negligence, breach of contract, and breach of warranties. GE was granted summary judgment on the negligence claim. GE’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on the remaining claims was denied. The jury returned a verdict in Princess’s favor for over $4.5 million, based on the judge’s instruction that implied warranties and consequential and incidental damages were available under the principles of Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 2-207. GE renewed its motion for judgment as a matter of law, seeking to have the award of incidental and consequential damages vacated, which was denied. GE appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Goodwin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 507,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 507,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 19,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

What would be an example where in a dispute, whether the UCC v. common law applied?

Want to see this answer?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and get access to all answers in our Q&A database

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial

Tempor minim nulla id mollit ullamco consequat aliquip adipisicing irure officia tempor. Magna sit eiusmod laborum proident laboris ex sunt. Non labore ex officia irure qui et laboris aliqua in minim. Labore velit aliqua proident officia cillum occaecat dolore tempor. Ullamco in consequat labore amet laborum proident reprehenderit anim cillum excepteur. Elit do nostrud nisi excepteur sit dolor pariatur fugiat. Nisi incididunt incididunt do est velit excepteur enim excepteur incididunt mollit pariatur. Irure tempor non in esse do. Laboris eiusmod in ad ut enim est duis ad sint veniam eiusmod. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt.