Prisoners of War Ethiopia's Claim 4 (Part 3), (Partial Award)

Decision of July 1, 2003

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Prisoners of War Ethiopia’s Claim 4 (Part 3), (Partial Award)

Permanent Court of Arbitration, Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission
Decision of July 1, 2003

RW

Facts

In 2000, the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (Ethiopia) (plaintiff) and the State of Eritrea (Eritrea) (defendant), both of them very poor countries, ended their two-year war by agreeing to submit their grievances to an international arbitration panel for resolution. Ethiopia sought compensation for the abuses Ethiopian prisoners of war (POWs) faced at the hands of their Eritrean captors. Evidence persuaded the arbitrators that Eritrea (1) under the circumstances found it impossible to give wounded POWs adequate battlefield medical treatment; (2) abused POWs during their forced marches to POW camps; (3) tortured POWs during interrogations; (4) subjected POW-camp internees to continuous, pervasive physical and mental abuse; (5) interned POWs in camps ill-equipped to provide suitable medical care or prevent the spread of infectious disease; and (6) denied permission for the International Commission of the Red Cross (ICRC) to visit POWs or inspect POW camps.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership