Prokopeva v. Carnival Corp.

2008 WL 4276975 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Prokopeva v. Carnival Corp.

United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
2008 WL 4276975 (2008)

Facts

Russian citizen Yana Prokopeva (plaintiff) worked as a stewardess aboard the Conquest (defendant), a ship owned by Carnival Corporation doing business as Carnival Cruise Lines (Carnival) (defendant). In July 2007, Prokopeva allegedly injured her back and body aboard the Conquest while on a voyage that had departed from Galveston, Texas. Prokopeva sued Carnival and the Conquest in federal district court in Texas, asserting that she had been injured in the course of her employment and that Prokopeva’s injuries were due to Carnival’s negligence or the Conquest’s unseaworthiness. Carnival moved to compel arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause in Prokopeva’s employment contract. The contract, called a Seafarer’s Agreement, contained an arbitration provision stating that except for wage disputes, any and all disputes arising out of the agreement had to be resolved by arbitration to be held in England, Monaco, Panama, or the Philippines, depending on the location of the employee’s home country. Those four potential nations were signatories to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the convention). The agreement also contained an acknowledgment in which Prokopeva and Carnival acknowledged that Prokopeva’s employment with Carnival was a commercial legal relationship between the parties. The agreement stated that Prokopeva accepted every term and condition of the agreement, including the arbitration provision, and that Carnival would not have employed Prokopeva if she had not agreed to the terms and conditions. The court analyzed the agreement and the convention in determining whether to compel arbitration.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jack, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership