Prosecutor v. Lubanga (Decision on Sentence Pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute)

Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Prosecutor v. Lubanga (Decision on Sentence Pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute)

International Criminal Court
Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06 (2012)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (Lubanga) (defendant) was president of the Union des Patriotes Congolais/Reconciliation et Paix (UPC/RP) political party for the Congolese district of Ituri. Armed conflict erupted in Ituri over land allocation and natural-resource appropriations. Lubanga and the UPC/RP raised an armed militia, the Forces Patriotiques pour la Liberation du Congo (FPLC), and Lubanga served as the FPLC’s commander in chief. The FPLC actively recruited significant numbers of children under the age of 15, some of whom were forcibly conscripted into service. Many child soldiers were used by senior officials as bodyguards and escorts. Lubanga and other officials were apprehended and convicted of war crimes by the International Criminal Court (ICC). The specific charges included the enlistment and conscription of child soldiers and the use of child soldiers in active hostilities. After Lubanga’s conviction, the ICC was tasked with determining the sentence Lubanga would receive for his crimes.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership