Prosser v. Keeton
Hypothetical
No Citation Available
- Written by Dan Lake, JD
Facts
A thief stole Prosser’s (plaintiff) watch and sold it to Keeton (defendant). Keeton paid a fair price for the watch, and reasonably believed that the thief was the true owner. Prosser brought a tort action against Keeton and the trial court ruled for Prosser, holding that Keeton was liable for conversion of the watch.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bateman, J.)
Concurrence (Compton, J.)
Dissent (Allen, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.