Pulfer v. Pulfer

673 N.E.2d 656 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pulfer v. Pulfer

Ohio Court of Appeals
673 N.E.2d 656 (1996)

  • Written by Jody Stuart, JD

Facts

James Pulfer (plaintiff) and Donna Pulfer (defendant) were parents to the minor child Donna Pulfer, Jr. (daughter). James and Donna divorced and entered into a shared-parenting agreement. The agreement provided that their daughter would live with Donna in Delphos, Ohio, and that neither parent would move outside the city of Delphos without prior written approval from the court of common pleas or approval via arbitration. The parenting agreement also provided that before using court action to resolve disputes under the agreement, the parents would use arbitration in an effort to resolve their disputes. On January 11, 1995, Donna filed a notice of intent to relocate with the court of common pleas. On January 18, Donna moved with her daughter to Lima, Ohio. On the same day, James filed objections to Donna’s intent to relocate. At a hearing on the matter before a referee, James requested that the matter be referred to arbitration in accordance with the parenting agreement. The referee refused James’s request and issued a recommendation that Donna’s relocation to Lima was in the best interests of her daughter. The court of common pleas issued an order adopting the referee’s recommendations. James appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Glasser, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership