Pulsifer v. Westshore Christian Academy
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
142 F.4th 859 (2025)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Aaron Pulsifer (plaintiff) was the assistant principal and dean of students at Westshore Christian Academy (Westshore) (defendant), a private elementary school in Michigan with the mission of helping students to grow their relationship with Christ, become lifelong learners, serve their communities, and develop Christian leadership skills. In his roles, Pulsifer performed many routine administrative and educational tasks. He also performed several religious functions. Westshore required the person in Pulsifer’s role to be a spiritual leader to students and staff. Pulsifer implemented and led two religious youth groups, prayed with staff and students, and led daily staff devotionals as well as devotionals at school-board meetings. Eventually, the relationship between Pulsifer and Westshore’s administrator deteriorated. Pulsifer, a Black male, complained that Westshore often withheld his paychecks despite regularly paying White, female coworkers. Pulsifer also claimed that Westshore treated the White coworkers better than him and expressed concern that he believed the school’s main donor to be a sex offender. After Westshore fired Pulsifer, Pulsifer sued Westshore for alleged violation of various state and federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Westshore argued that judicial review of Pulsifer’s claims was precluded by the ministerial exception because Pulsifer had performed important religious functions at the school. The district court granted summary judgment in Westshore’s favor, agreeing that the ministerial exception applied. Pulsifer appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bush, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 914,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 999 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


