Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLC

813 F. Supp. 2d 489 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLC

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
813 F. Supp. 2d 489 (2011)

Play video

Facts

In 2006, Lauren Brenner (plaintiff) prepared to franchise her successful military-themed gym, Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. (Pure Power) (plaintiff). Brenner asked Pure Power’s instructors to sign employment agreements that prohibited disclosing Pure Power’s confidential information. The agreements did not specify that lost profits could be recovered for breach. In July 2007, Pure Power instructors Ruben Belliard and Alexander Fell (defendants) decided to open their own military-themed gym, Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLC (Warrior Fitness) (defendant). Belliard stole Pure Power’s business plan, start-up manual, and operations manual and shared them with Fell and Jennifer Lee (defendant), who used the materials to create Warrior Fitness’s business documents. Belliard also downloaded Pure Power’s customer list. Belliard and Fell left Pure Power in early 2008 and opened Warrior Fitness shortly thereafter. In the interim, Pure Power employee Elizabeth Lorenzi and client Cheryl Dumas accessed and printed Fell’s personal emails from the company computer using Fell’s stored password. Lorenzi and Dumas showed the emails to Brenner. Brenner and Pure Power sued Belliard, Fell, Lee, and Warrior Fitness, asserting multiple claims, including breach of contract and breach of the duty of loyalty. Pure Power sought damages including lost profits and disgorgement of Warrior Fitness’s profits from 2008 through 2010. Belliard and Fell filed counterclaims, including a claim that Brenner, Lorenzi, and Dumas violated the Stored Communications Act by accessing Fell’s personal emails without his permission.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Katz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership