Quilloin v. Tenet HealthSystem Philadelphia, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
673 F.3d 221 (2012)
Janice Quilloin (plaintiff) worked for Hahnemann University Hospital on two separate occasions. Before beginning her employment on both occasions Quilloin signed an arbitration agreement. The agreement provided that both parties would be responsible for their own expenses and attorney fees for arbitration. The agreement also allowed the arbitrator to award any remedy available if the claim had been heard in a court. The agreement did not contain any provision on class actions. Quilloin later sued the hospital, the corporations that owned and managed the hospital, and their parent corporation, Tenet HealthSystem Philadelphia, Inc. (Tenet) (defendants). The district court denied Tenet’s motion to compel arbitration, and Tenet appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Sher, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 723,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 723,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.