Qwest Communications International, Inc. v. FCC

229 F.3d 1172 (2000)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Qwest Communications International, Inc. v. FCC

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
229 F.3d 1172 (2000)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (defendant) required regional Bell operating companies (the companies) to maintain records of property they used in their telephone operations. Qwest Communications International, Inc. (Qwest) (plaintiff) was one of the companies. The FCC audited the companies and found that the companies may have been overstating their costs. The companies challenged the audit, and the FCC set a public-comment period on the auditing process. MCI, a competitor of Qwest, requested that the FCC publicly release the raw data used during the audit. Qwest argued against the release, explaining that the raw data contained sensitive business information MCI could use to enhance its business. The FCC released the data under a protective order according to an FCC policy allowing audit data to be released only if there is public interest in the data and the disclosure will not cause competitive injury to the company being audited or impair future audits. However, the FCC did not explain why the release of data was warranted in this case. Qwest challenged the release, alleging the release violated the Trade Secrets Act.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership