R.I. L-R v. Johnson
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
80 F. Supp. 3d 164 (2015)
- Written by Nathan Benedict, JD
Facts
The government adopted a “no-release policy,” denying release on bond to asylum seekers pending the outcome of their removal hearings. R.I. L-R and nine others (plaintiffs) were mothers accompanied by minor children who had sought political asylum in the United States. They were detained for weeks or months until released on bond, even though they did not have criminal records and had family members in the United States who were willing to house and support them. The plaintiffs brought a class-action lawsuit, claiming that the no-release policy violated the Immigration and Nationality Act and the United States Constitution’s Due Process Clause. The government argued that the no-release policy discouraged others from immigrating.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Boasberg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 955,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

