R. v. Brown
House of Lords
2 All ER. (1993)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Brown (defendant) and others (collectively Defendants) engaged in acts of consensual sado-masochistic homosexual encounters and were thereafter charged with, and convicted of, assaults and woundings. The court of appeal affirmed the convictions and certified the following point of law for consideration by the House of Lords, namely, whether the prosecution must prove lack of consent on the part of person B who is assaulted and/or wounded by person A during the course of a consensual sado-masochistic encounter before person A may be found guilty of a crime.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Templeman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

