R.W. Docks & Slips v. State

628 N.W.2d 781 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

R.W. Docks & Slips v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court
628 N.W.2d 781 (2001)

  • Written by Sheryl McGrath, JD

Facts

R.W. Docks & Slips (developer) (plaintiff) planned to construct a Lake Superior marina with about 270 boat slips. The developer built a breakwater and built all but 71 of the boat slips. As a result of the breakwater, a weed bed grew on the shoreline. When the developer applied for a permit to dredge the shoreline for construction of the remaining 71 slips, the permit was denied by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (state) (defendant). The state found that the proposed dredging would damage the weed bed and that accordingly the permit must be denied. The developer filed a regulatory-taking claim against the state. In the claim, the developer alleged that the marina had been operating at a deficit and that construction of the remaining 71 slips was necessary to make the marina profitable. The trial court and intermediate appellate court denied the developer’s taking claim. The developer appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sykes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership