Racine & Laramie, Ltd., Inc. v. Department of Parks and Recreation
Court of Appeal of California
14 Cal. Rptr. 2d 335 (1992)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Racine & Laramie, Ltd., Inc. (Racine) (plaintiff) had a 40-year contract with the California Department of Parks and Recreation (the department) (defendant) to operate concessions at a state park. Several years into its contract, Racine began negotiations with the department to expand Racine’s operations to include a full-service restaurant and the sale of alcohol on the premises. Negotiations took place over several years. Negotiations eventually broke down, and the department declined to enter into an amended contract. Racine sued the department for a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, based on the department’s apparent reversal of its negotiating stance. The jury concluded that the department had exhibited bad faith in its negotiations and awarded damages to Racine. The department appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Froehlich, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.