Racing Investment Fund 2000, LLC v. Clay Ward Agency, Inc.
Kentucky Supreme Court
320 S.W.3d 654
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Racing Investment Fund 2000, LLC (Racing Investment) (defendant) purchased insurance from Clay Ward Agency, Inc. (Clay Ward) (plaintiff). In May 2004, after falling behind on payments, Racing Investment agreed to a judgment. Racing Investment, which by then had become defunct, failed to pay the entire judgment when due. The trial court found that a provision of Racing Investment’s Operating Agreement (Operating Agreement) requiring members to make occasional capital infusions for business expenses was an available means to satisfy the judgment. The trial court ordered Racing Investment to satisfy the judgment accordingly. The Court of Appeals affirmed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Abramson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.