Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Ramada Development Co. v. Rauch

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
644 F.2d 1097 (5th Cir. 1981)


Facts

In 1972, Martin Rauch (defendant) signed a contract with the Ramada Development Company (Ramada) (plaintiff), under which Ramada agreed to build a Ramada Inn Motor Hotel (motel) for Rauch. Rauch took occupancy of the motel in early 1974, but refused to pay the outstanding balance to Ramada. Rauch based his lack of payment on alleged defects in the construction of the motel. In 1974, Ramada commissioned a study (the Goldsmith Report) to investigate the defects that Rauch had alleged. Specifically, Ramada commissioned the Goldsmith Report in order to identify any defects in the construction so that Ramada could have informed settlement discussions with Rauch. Ramada brought suit against Rauch to recover the outstanding balance. At trial, Rauch sought to introduce the Goldsmith Report into evidence. The district court excluded the Goldsmith Report as a settlement offer inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence (FRE) 408. The district court found in favor of Ramada. Rauch appealed, arguing that there was no pretrial understanding between the parties that the Goldsmith Report was intended to be used in settlement negotiations.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Tuttle, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.