Randi W. v. Muroc Joint Unified School District
Supreme Court of California
929 P.2d 582 (1997)
Randi (plaintiff), a 13-year-old student, alleged that Gadams, the vice-principal of her school, sexually assaulted her. She brought claims for negligent misrepresentation and fraud against four school districts (defendants) that had previously employed Gadams. Randi alleged that the school districts, despite knowing of complaints against Gadams for sexual misconduct, gave him unreservedly positive letters of reference, and that Randi’s school relied on these positive references in hiring Gadams. The trial court dismissed the claims, finding that even if the facts alleged were true, Randi could not succeed on her claims as a matter of law. The court of appeals reversed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Chin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.