United States Supreme Court
547 U.S. 715 (2006)
John Rapanos (defendant) was charged in federal court with violating the Clean Water Act (CWA) after backfilling approximately 54 acres of land he owned in Michigan without first obtaining a permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). At trial, Rapanos argued that no permit was required because his property was not considered “navigable water” under the CWA. Rapanos claimed that the land was only intermittently saturated with water and not immediately adjacent to navigable water. The nearest body of water was 20 miles away. The district court disagreed, held Rapanos’ property to be “waters of the United States,” and found Rapanos liable for violating the CWA. Rapanos appealed. The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s judgment. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.