Raphan v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 457 (1983)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Raphan v. United States

United States Claims Court
3 Cl. Ct. 457 (1983)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

In 1969 Louis, Peter, and Paul Pomponio purchased a tract of land in Virginia to develop into the James Buchanan House, an apartment building with commercial space. The Pomponios transferred the land to the James Buchanan Corporation (JBC). A group of real estate investors called the Tenzer Group formed a partnership with the Pomponios (the partnership) to develop the James Buchanan House and contributed $2 million to the project. The partnership took out a $9.4 million construction loan (the loan) from the Royal National Bank. According to the partnership agreement, JBC would nominally hold title in the property for loan purposes. The Tenzer Group and the Pomponios would be liable for the loan as partners in the partnership. In 1972 the Tenzer Group discovered that the Pomponios were stealing from the partnership and violating their duties to develop the James Buchanan House. The Tenzer Group forced the Pomponios to terminate their interest in the partnership. JBC transferred title in the property back to the partnership, and the Tenzer Group was able to complete the project. Members of the Tenzer Group (plaintiffs) deducted losses associated with the project on their 1970 and 1971 taxes. The government (defendant) disallowed the loss deduction. The government argued that the Tenzer Group was not entitled to the losses. Instead, the government argued, JBC was entitled to the losses as it held title to the property during the relevant period. Further, the government argued that even if the Tenzer Group was entitled to the losses, it could not deduct the losses because its loss deduction was capped at the amount that the Tenzer Group contributed to the partnership. The members of the Tenzer Group appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kozinski, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 741,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership