Rash v. J.V. Intermediate, Ltd
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
498 F.3d 1201 (2007)
J.V. Intermediate, Ltd. and J.V. Industrial Companies, Ltd. (JVIC) (plaintiff) hired W. Clayton Rash (defendant) to open and manage a division of JVIC in Tulsa, Oklahoma that would maintain oil refineries and power plants in that area. The employment contract required Rash to use all his work time for JVIC from 1999 to 2001. Rash served as manager until 2004 without a contract extension. As manager, Rash reviewed bids on projects for JVIC and selected Total Industrial Plan Services, Inc. (TIPS) to provide scaffolding services on several occasions. Rash never disclosed to JVIC that he was the owner of TIPS. Between 2001 and 2004, JVIC opened its own scaffolding division. Rash never employed JVIC’s scaffolding services. JVIC brought a breach of fiduciary duty claim against Rash and sought summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.