Raso v. Lago

135 F.3d 11 (1998)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Raso v. Lago

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
135 F.3d 11 (1998)

Facts

The residents of Boston’s Old West End (former West Enders) were forced to relocate when their homes were taken by eminent domain. The former West Enders were almost entirely White. After receiving funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (defendant), a developer constructed a new apartment complex in Old West End called West End Place. The developer granted former West Enders the right of first priority for all of the apartments in West End Place. However, HUD later decided that former West Enders had first priority for only a limited number of West End Place apartments. Four former West Enders (plaintiffs) brought suit against HUD, contending, among other claims, that HUD violated their right to equal protection under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution by engaging in racial discrimination. The district court dismissed the case. The four former West Enders appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Boudin, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Stahl, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership