Ratcliffe v. Evans
England and Wales High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
[1892] 2 Q.B. 524 (1892)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Ratcliffe (plaintiff) and his father operated a business. When Ratcliffe’s father died, Evans (defendant) published an article in a newspaper that stated that the business no longer existed after the father’s death. This was in fact not the case and Ratcliffe brought suit for injurious falsehood. The trial court found in Ratcliffe’s favor, and Evans appealed on the grounds that Ratcliffe did not plead any special damages, only a general loss of business.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bowen, L.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.