Ratner v. Central National Bank of Miami

414 So.2d 210 (1982)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ratner v. Central National Bank of Miami

Florida Courts of Appeal
414 So.2d 210 (1982)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Joel Ratner (defendant) was the promoter of The Stereo Corner, Inc. (Stereo Corner). On November 3, 1978, Ratner, on behalf of Stereo Corner, entered into a merchant’s Mastercharge agreement with Central National Bank of Miami (Central) (plaintiff). Ratner incorporated Stereo Corner on July 10, 1979. From April to October 1979, a number of sales drafts were forged by a Stereo Corner employee and resulted in a series of charge-backs against Stereo Corner’s bank account with Central. Central sought recovery from Stereo Corner, but Stereo Corner had become insolvent. Central sued Ratner as an individual, claiming Ratner was personally liable with respect to the merchant’s Mastercharge agreement. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Central. Ratner appealed to the Florida Courts of Appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ferguson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership