Logourl black

Rauchman v. Mobil Corp.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
739 F.2d 205 (1984)


Facts

Rauchman (plaintiff) owns voting shares of stock in Mobil Corp. (defendant). Rauchman was concerned that the Mobil board included an OPEC citizen, following the appointment of Mr. Olayan, a Saudi Arabian citizen. Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 14a-8(a), Rauchman proposed an amendment to the corporation’s bylaws, to be included in Mobil’s proxy statement for the company’s 1982 annual meeting. The proposal would have amended Mobil’s bylaws to prevent a citizen of any OPEC country from sitting on the board of directors. Mobil refused to include the proposal in its proxy statement for the 1982 annual meeting, on the basis that SEC Rule 14a-8(c)(8) allows a company to exclude a proposal relating to an election to office of the board of directors, and Mr. Olayan was eligible for reelection at the 1982 annual meeting. Rauchman brought suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, in an attempt to force Mobil to include the proposal in its proxy statement. The court found that the proposal related to an election to office, because if the proposal was adopted, Mr. Olayan would be ineligible to sit on Mobil’s board. The court held that Mobil had properly refused to include the proposal, and granted Mobil’s motion for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Engel, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 81,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 11,364 briefs - keyed to 151 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now