Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers

571 U.S. 177 (2014)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers

United States Supreme Court
571 U.S. 177 (2014)

SC

Facts

The Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers (the fund) (plaintiff) sued Ray Haluch Gravel Co. (RH Gravel) (defendant) on behalf of RH Gravel employees to recover certain pension compensation. A trial was held, and on June 17, 2011, the trial court awarded the fund $17,000 in unpaid pension compensation. On July 25, 2011, the trial court awarded the fund $35,000 in attorney’s fees. On August 15, 2011, the fund appealed both decisions. RH Gravel filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as to the June 17 judgment, arguing that the 30-day appeal period for that judgment had passed. The court of appeals denied RH Gravel’s motion to dismiss, finding that the two judgments were part of one final judgment entered on July 25. Viewed this way, the fund’s appeal was timely. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether the June 17 judgment was final for appellate purposes. The fund argued that its right to attorney’s fees came from its contracts with RH Gravel and thus were not collateral but part of the merits of its compensation claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership