Raymond James Financial Services v. Fenyk

780 F.3d 59, 60-68 (2015)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Raymond James Financial Services v. Fenyk

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
780 F.3d 59, 60-68 (2015)

Facts

Robert Fenyk (defendant), a stockbroker, was an independent contractor of Raymond James Financial Services (RJFS) (plaintiff). RJFS was based in Florida. Fenyk managed RJFS’s branch office in Vermont. The contract between Fenyk and RJFS contained a Florida choice-of-law provision and an arbitration clause that required any disputes arising out of the independent contractor relationship to be arbitrated. RJFS terminated the independent contractor relationship after Fenyk was accused of alcoholism. Fenyk filed suit in state court, claiming that he was wrongfully terminated due to Fenyk’s sexual orientation and disability status as a recovering alcoholic, which violated Vermont’s employment-discrimination laws. Fenyk withdrew the suit and submitted the claims to arbitration. RJFS argued that Florida law should apply and that Fenyk’s claims were time-barred under Florida’s statute of limitations. The arbitrators agreed that Florida law applied but awarded Fenyk damages on a Florida claim of disability discrimination that Fenyk never asserted. The arbitration panel decided that Fenyk’s mislabeling the claim as one brought under Vermont law rather than Florida law was not a fatal mistake. RJFS motioned the district court to vacate the arbitration award. The district court granted the motion, concluding that the arbitration panel exceeded its powers by awarding damages on a claim Fenyk never asserted and ignoring Florida’s statute of limitations, which rendered the claim time-barred. Fenyk appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lipez, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership