Recognition Equipment v. NCR Corp.

532 F. Supp. 271 (1981)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Recognition Equipment v. NCR Corp.

United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
532 F. Supp. 271 (1981)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Recognition Equipment, Inc. (Recognition) (plaintiff) contracted to sell mechanical goods and parts to NCR Corporation (defendant). The contract contained an arbitration provision stating that the parties agreed to arbitrate any disputes arising under the contract. Recognition claimed that it sent the requested goods to NCR but received insufficient payment based on an outdated pricing list. Recognition filed suit in Texas state court, and NCR removed the case to federal court. NCR filed a motion to stay proceedings pending arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), citing the arbitration provision of the sales contract. Recognition claimed that it did not agree to arbitration of the dispute. Recognition further argued that even if it were bound to arbitration, the parties were entitled to continue discovery pending arbitration under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court found that Recognition did agree to arbitrate the dispute and then addressed Recognition’s discovery claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Porter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership