Redpath v. Kissinger

415 F. Supp 566 (1976)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Redpath v. Kissinger

United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
415 F. Supp 566 (1976)

Facts

Redpath (plaintiff), a United States citizen, was arrested in Mexico for writing bad checks. Redpath was appointed an attorney by the United States Consulate and ultimately sentenced to five years in Mexican prison. Redpath alleged that he was being tortured in Mexican prison. The State Department (defendant) conducted an inquiry into the matter and found the claims to be unsubstantiated. Redpath filed a writ of mandamus against the State Department of the United States, claiming that it violated 22 U.S.C. § 1732, which imposes a duty on the president’s administration to demand release of American citizens unjustly deprived of their liberties by foreign governments. The State Department filed a motion to dismiss.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Spears, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership