Reed v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.
Washington Supreme Court
201 P. 783 (1921)
- Written by Nicholas Decoster, JD
Facts
B. F. Reed (plaintiff) and his daughter were injured after a vehicle driven by Reed’s daughter collided with a streetcar owned by the Tacoma Railway & Power Company (Tacoma) (defendant). Reed brought a suit for damages against Tacoma. In district court, Tacoma alleged that the negligent actions of Reed’s daughter led to the accident and that Reed should be prevented from recovering due to his daughter’s contributory negligence. The district court gave the jury an instruction that directed the jury to find contributory negligence if Reed’s daughter had made an error in judgment by determining that she could make it onto and off of the tracks of Tacoma’s streetcar before the streetcar reached her. Under this instruction, the jury found Reed’s daughter guilty of contributory negligence and dismissed the action. Reed appealed the decision, arguing that the jury instruction was invalid.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bridges, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
