From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...
Reed v. University of North Dakota and The North Dakota Association for the Disabled, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Dakota
589 N.W.2d 880 (1999)
Jace Reed (Reed) (plaintiff) played hockey for the University of North Dakota (UND) (defendant). During preseason training, Reed participated in a race sponsored by the North Dakota Association for the Disabled (NDAD) (defendant). Prior to the race, Reed signed a waiver, which stated that Reed would assume responsibility for any injury he may sustain. The waiver was a part of the registration form. Reed was injured while running, and he sued UND and NDAD for negligence. NDAD defended by alleging that the waiver exonerated NDAD from liability. NDAD motioned for summary judgment, and the trial court granted the motion. Reed appealed on the grounds that the waiver was not supported by consideration.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Maring, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.