Reeves Brothers, Inc. v. United States Laminating Corp. and Travis Rauch

282 F. Supp. 118, 157 U.S.P.Q. 235 (1968)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Reeves Brothers, Inc. v. United States Laminating Corp. and Travis Rauch

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
282 F. Supp. 118, 157 U.S.P.Q. 235 (1968)

Facts

A patent describing a foam-lamination process (the Dickey patent) was assigned to Reeves Brothers, Inc. (plaintiff), which initiated an infringement action against United States Laminating Corp. (defendant) and Travis Rauch (defendant) in federal district court. United States Laminating Corp. and Rauch challenged the validity of the Dickey patent on a number of grounds, including anticipation by specifications disclosed in a Gebrauchsmuster (GM), also known as a utility model. GMs were a form of patent protection issued by the German patent office and were effective for less time (six years) than regular German patents (18 years) and required a more time-consuming application process. Also, unlike standard German patents, GMs did not require novelty and were not printed publications. Finally, GMs excluded processes from protection.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bartels, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership