Regina v. Ernest George Thompson, Brian Albert Johnson, and Colin Alex Norman Woodiwiss

Case 7/78, E.C.R. 2247 (1978)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Regina v. Ernest George Thompson, Brian Albert Johnson, and Colin Alex Norman Woodiwiss

European Union Court of Justice
Case 7/78, E.C.R. 2247 (1978)

Facts

Under the law in the United Kingdom (UK), importing gold coins or exporting silver coins minted before 1947 that were not more than 100 years old at a quantity of more than 10 coins was prohibited without a license from the board of trade. Ernest George Thompson (Thompson) imported South African gold coins from Germany into the UK and exported silver coins from the UK to Germany in violation of UK law and was charged in criminal proceedings. In some European Union (EU) member states, silver coins were recognized as legal tender, and South African gold coins were treated as the equivalent of currency in member states that permitted dealing in South African gold coins. The UK court requested a preliminary ruling from the European Union Court of Justice on whether the import and export of coins was protected by the free movement of goods or capital under community legislation.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership