Regina v. Martin Dyos

[1979] Crim. L.R. 660

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Regina v. Martin Dyos

Central Criminal Court
[1979] Crim. L.R. 660

Play video

Facts

Dyos (defendant) was a member of a group of seven young men who participated in a fight with another group of five youths following a dance at a community center. During the fight, one of the group of five, RM, was hit in the forehead by a brick and received another blow behind his right ear. Dyos admitted to the police that he had hit RM with the brick but there was no indication as to the source of the second wound. When RM subsequently died from his injuries, Dyos was charged with affray, murder and grievous bodily harm. At Dyos’ trial, a pathologist testified that both wounds were potentially fatal, that RM might have survived from the first wound, but that there was no certainty as to which wound occurred first. At the close of the prosecution’s (plaintiff’s) case, the court granted Dyos’ motion to dismiss the murder charge on the grounds that, first, the injury behind RM’s ear might have been the cause of death, and second, there was no evidence that Dyos’ blow with the brick was beyond a reasonable doubt the cause of death. The prosecution appealed to the Central Criminal Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cantley, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership