Reid v. Horne
Mississippi Supreme Court
187 So. 2d 316 (1966)
- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
W.H. and Quinn Horne (plaintiffs) owned a tract of land that was bounded on one side by property belonging to John and Juanita Reid (defendants). For some time, the Reids permitted the Hornes to travel across the Reid property, but the Reids eventually revoked this permission. The Hornes brought suit, alleging that they had an irrevocable license—a grant of permission to use another’s property that could not be revoked by the grantor—to travel across the Reid property.. However, there was no written proof of the irrevocable license alleged by the Hornes. The trial court ruled in favor of the Hornes. The Reids appealed to the Mississippi Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.