Rex v. Russell
Supreme Court of Victoria
Vict. L.R. 59 (1933)
- Written by Walter Machniki, JD
Facts
Russell (defendant) was charged with murdering his wife and two children by drowning them. At trial, the foreman of the jury asked the judge what Russell would be guilty of if, instead of drowning his wife and two children, Russell stood idly by while his wife drowned the two children and herself. After considering the question, the judge stated that Russell would be guilty of manslaughter if those were the circumstances because Russell had a legal duty to care for his wife and his children. The jury subsequently convicted Russell of three counts of manslaughter. Russell appealed these convictions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cussen, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.