Richardson v. Union Carbide Industrial Gases, Inc.

790 A.2d 962 (2002)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
R
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Richardson v. Union Carbide Industrial Gases, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
790 A.2d 962 (2002)

SC
Play video

Facts

Hoeganaes (defendant) purchased equipment for its furnace from Rage. Both the proposal for purchase from Rage and the purchase order from Hoeganaes contained language stating that each document was subject to various terms and conditions supplied by each company. The terms and conditions in each document contained an indemnity clause and the two indemnity clauses conflicted. The terms and conditions were never discussed during the formation of the contract. About three years after the sale, Jerry Richardson (plaintiff), an employee of Hoeganaes, was injured when the furnace in question exploded. Richardson filed suit against Rage and Hoeganaes, and Rage cross-claimed against Hoeganaes seeking indemnification. The trial court granted summary judgment to Hoeganaes on the cross-claim. Rage appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Braithwaite, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 782,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Contracts

Key Terms