Rider v. State

544 So. 2d 994 (1989)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rider v. State

Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
544 So. 2d 994 (1989)

DC

Facts

Robin Rider (defendant) was the step-father of a young girl. Shortly after his stepdaughter’s ninth birthday, Rider began sexually touching her and continued doing so until around the time of her twelfth birthday. In one instance, Rider sat next to her on the couch and showed her a pornographic movie. While she was watching the movie, Rider forced his hand onto her genitals. Shortly thereafter, Rider touched her genitals with his mouth and then had her touch his genitals with her mouth. After these incidents occurred, Rider would apologize to his stepdaughter and tell her it would not happen again. Rider was eventually charged with sexual abuse in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree. At trial, Rider’s stepdaughter testified that she considered Rider like a father and liked the way he treated her. Rider’s stepdaughter also testified that she knew his behavior was wrong but had gone along with it because she thought if she stopped, he would stop treating her well. Rider was convicted of both counts and subsequently appealed his conviction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bowen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership