From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Right v. Breen
Connecticut Supreme Court
890 A.2d 1287 (2006)
Right (plaintiff) was stopped at a red light in his automobile, when a car driven by Breen (defendant) collided with Right from behind. Right then brought a negligence claim against Breen. The jury determined that Right incurred zero damages as a result of the accident, and found Breen not liable. Right then moved to set aside the verdict and for additur, claiming that Breen owed Right nominal damages because of the legal injury caused by Breen. The trial court granted these motions, awarding Right $1 in nominal damages and costs. Breen appealed, and the Connecticut Appellate Court affirmed the trial court’s decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Katz, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.