Rios v. Davis

373 S.W.2d 386 (1963)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Rios v. Davis

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
373 S.W.2d 386 (1963)

  • Written by Joseph Bowman, JD
Play video

Facts

In an action prior to this one, Popular Dry Goods Company (Dry Goods) sued Davis (defendant) for property damages, which resulted from an automobile accident. In the same prior case, Davis alleged contributory negligence and joined Rios as a third party defendant. The jury in that case found that Dry Goods, Davis, and Rios were negligent. Dry Goods was denied recovery from Davis, and Davis was denied recovery from Rios. Rios (plaintiff) then instituted the present action against Davis. Davis alleged contributory negligence and objected to the action on the basis of res judicata and collateral estoppel, asserting that the present action was based on facts already presented and subject to findings in the prior action brought by Dry Goods. The district court held that the present action was barred on the basis of res judicata, and Rios appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Collings, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership