RKO-Stanley Warner Theatres, Inc. v. Graziano
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
355 A.2d 830 (1976)
In April 1970, Jack Jenofsky and Ralph Graziano (defendants) entered into an agreement of sale to purchase a parcel of land from RKO-Stanley Warner Theatres, Inc. (RKO) (plaintiff). Paragraph 19 of the agreement provided that the purchasers intended to incorporate, and that as long as they incorporated prior to the closing, all agreements “shall be construed to have been made between Seller and the resultant corporation . . . .” The closing date was continued twice, ultimately to October 21, 1970. Jenofsky and Graziano filed articles of incorporation with the state on October 9, 1970. They failed to complete the sale by the closing date, and RKO sued to enforce the agreement of sale against the purchasers individually. The trial court found in favor of RKO. Jenofsky and Graziano appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Eagen, J.)
Dissent (Manderino, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 169,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.