Robert Azinian, Kenneth Davitian & Ellen Baca v. United Mexcian States

Case No. ARB(AF)/97/2, 14 ICSID Rev. FILJ 238 (1999)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Robert Azinian, Kenneth Davitian & Ellen Baca v. United Mexcian States

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
Case No. ARB(AF)/97/2, 14 ICSID Rev. FILJ 238 (1999)

Facts

Robert Azinian, Kenneth Davitian, and Ellen Baca (plaintiffs) were shareholders of a Mexican corporate entity named Desechos Solidos de Naucalpan S.A. de C.V. (DESONA). DESONA was the holder of a concession contract with the administrative authority of Naucalpan de Juarez (Naucalpan), Mexico, relating to waste collection and disposal in that city. Naucalpan identified several irregularities in DESONA’s performance of the contract, including the failure to implement the use of several new vehicles as promised under the contract. Naucalpan decided to annul the concession contract. Azinian, Davitian, and Baca, as owners of DESONA, commenced arbitration proceedings against the Mexican government (defendant), claiming that Nuacalpan’s cancellation of the concession contract violated the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). During the arbitration, DESONA’s manager, Ariel Goldenstein, testified on DESONA’s behalf. Throughout the proceeding, Goldenstein demonstrated a cavalier attitude toward DESONA’s questionable business practices.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership