Roberts Contracting Co. v. Valentine-Wooten Road Public Facility Board

2009 Ark. App. 437, 320 S.W.3d 1 (2009)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Roberts Contracting Co. v. Valentine-Wooten Road Public Facility Board

Arkansas Court of Appeals
2009 Ark. App. 437, 320 S.W.3d 1 (2009)

SC
Play video

Facts

Valentine-Wooten Road Public Facility Board (VWR) (defendant) hired Roberts Contracting Co. (Roberts) (plaintiff) to build a sewer system. The construction ran into a number of issues, including obtaining necessary easements, weather, and a separate contract dispute. As a result, Roberts’s ability to complete construction was continually delayed and more than a year after the initial projected completion date, Roberts ceased performance. Roberts had been paid throughout the entire process, but the sewer system was not functional when he ceased performance. After Roberts walked off the job, VWR refused to pay Roberts’s last bill in its entirety. Roberts brought suit against VWR. The trial court found in favor of VWR, concluding that Roberts had not substantially performed. Roberts appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gruber, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership