Roberts Contracting Co. v. Valentine-Wooten Road Public Facility Board
Arkansas Court of Appeals
2009 Ark. App. 437, 320 S.W.3d 1 (2009)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Valentine-Wooten Road Public Facility Board (VWR) (defendant) hired Roberts Contracting Co. (Roberts) (plaintiff) to build a sewer system. The construction ran into a number of issues, including obtaining necessary easements, weather, and a separate contract dispute. As a result, Roberts’s ability to complete construction was continually delayed and more than a year after the initial projected completion date, Roberts ceased performance. Roberts had been paid throughout the entire process, but the sewer system was not functional when he ceased performance. After Roberts walked off the job, VWR refused to pay Roberts’s last bill in its entirety. Roberts brought suit against VWR. The trial court found in favor of VWR, concluding that Roberts had not substantially performed. Roberts appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gruber, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.