From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...
Roberts v. Ross
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
344 F.2d 747 (3d Cir. 1965)
Herbert Roberts (plaintiff) brought suit against Norman Ross (defendant) to recover money Roberts alleged that Ross owed him for work done as Ross’s realtor. The District Court of the Virgin Islands found in favor of Ross and, rather than drafting an opinion, ordered Ross’s counsel to file proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and draft of judgment. The judge then signed, without altering, the draft of judgment, adopting it as his opinion. Roberts appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Maris, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 136,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.